Judge Grant W
Judge Grant W
1 MIN READ
Judge Grant W. Hawkins, from Indianapolis, in the Charles Barker's case ruled that the state's death penalty statute was unconstitutional in light of a recent U.S. Supreme Court. Hawkins based his ruling on Apprendi v. New Jersey (530 U.S. 466 (2000)). In Apprendi, the U.S. Supreme Court held that any fact, other than a prior conviction, that increases the penalty for a crime beyond the prescribed statutory maximum must be submitted to a jury and proved beyond a reasonable doubt.In Indiana, the jury makes an unbinding recommendation to the judge, who sentences the defendant. Judge Hawkins ruled that the Indiana statute violates Apprendi because it is possible that a judge could sentence an inmate to death even though a jury has failed to find, beyond a reasonable doubt, the existence of an aggravating factor.
— SOURCES
- (Sources Order on Supplemental Motion to Dismiss Death Penalty, 10/09/2001)
KEEP READING
ALL THE NEWS · DEATH PENALTY On the same front

DEATH PENALTYSEPTEMBER 2, 2026
IRAN - Aziz Roshanayi executed in Shiraz on September 2

DEATH PENALTYSEPTEMBER 2, 2026
IRAN - 3 men executed in Mashhad on September 2

DEATH PENALTYAUGUST 31, 2026
Pakistan: ASI sentenced to death for killing two brothers in Swabi

DEATH PENALTYAUGUST 31, 2026
Bangladesh: HC confirms death sentence of lone accused for rape, murder of 8-year-old Asiya

DEATH PENALTYAUGUST 31, 2026
IRAN - Mojtaba Salahi Laghani executed in Rasht on September 2

DEATH PENALTYAUGUST 30, 2026
