justices overturned 5-4 an appeals court ruling that declared Ronald Sanders' sentence unconstitutional.
justices overturned 5-4 an appeals court ruling that declared Ronald Sanders' sentence unconstitutional.
1 MIN READ
justices overturned 5-4 an appeals court ruling that declared Ronald Sanders' sentence unconstitutional. Sanders was put on death row in the 1981 killing of a Janice Allen during a drug-related robbery.
Justice Antonin Scalia wrote the ruling, the court's 1st death penalty decision since Roberts replaced Chief Justice William H. Rehnquist last fall.
The case presented a technical question for the court involving jurors' consideration of invalid aggravating factors.
Special circumstances used by prosecutors in their case against Sanders -- that the crime was committed during a burglary and was cruel or heinous -- were later found invalid.
California argued that Sanders would have been sentenced to death even without those arguments. The US Supreme Court's 5 conservative members agreed.
"The erroneous factor could not have 'skewed' the sentence, and no constitutional violation occurred," Scalia wrote in an opinion joined by Roberts, retiring Justice Sandra Day O'Connor and Justices Anthony Kennedy and Clarence Thomas.
In a dissent, Justice John Paul Stevens said "this decision is more likely to complicate than to clarify our capital sentencing jurisprudence."
Also disagreeing with the decision were Justices David H. Souter, Ruth Bader Ginsburg, and Stephen Breyer, although their reasons were varied.
In a lengthy dissent, Breyer said the court's finding could "deprive a defendant of a fair and reliable sentencing proceeding."
Justice Antonin Scalia wrote the ruling, the court's 1st death penalty decision since Roberts replaced Chief Justice William H. Rehnquist last fall.
The case presented a technical question for the court involving jurors' consideration of invalid aggravating factors.
Special circumstances used by prosecutors in their case against Sanders -- that the crime was committed during a burglary and was cruel or heinous -- were later found invalid.
California argued that Sanders would have been sentenced to death even without those arguments. The US Supreme Court's 5 conservative members agreed.
"The erroneous factor could not have 'skewed' the sentence, and no constitutional violation occurred," Scalia wrote in an opinion joined by Roberts, retiring Justice Sandra Day O'Connor and Justices Anthony Kennedy and Clarence Thomas.
In a dissent, Justice John Paul Stevens said "this decision is more likely to complicate than to clarify our capital sentencing jurisprudence."
Also disagreeing with the decision were Justices David H. Souter, Ruth Bader Ginsburg, and Stephen Breyer, although their reasons were varied.
In a lengthy dissent, Breyer said the court's finding could "deprive a defendant of a fair and reliable sentencing proceeding."
— SOURCES
- (Sources: Associated Press, Los Angeles Times, 11/01/2006)
KEEP READING
ALL THE NEWS · DEATH PENALTY On the same front

DEATH PENALTYAUGUST 31, 2026
Pakistan: ASI sentenced to death for killing two brothers in Swabi

DEATH PENALTYAUGUST 31, 2026
Bangladesh: HC confirms death sentence of lone accused for rape, murder of 8-year-old Asiya

DEATH PENALTYAUGUST 30, 2026
Pakistan: Man sentenced to death, brother gets life term for double murder in 2021

DEATH PENALTYAUGUST 23, 2026
Eastern Libya executes 10 convicted on terrorism charges

DEATH PENALTYAUGUST 21, 2026
Japan: man executed over killing 5 people

DEATH PENALTYAUGUST 15, 2026
