A divided US Supreme Court underscored its view that...
A divided US Supreme Court underscored its view that jurors choosing between a death sentence and a life term in prison should be told if the convicted killer has no chance of parole
1 MIN READ
A divided US Supreme Court underscored its view that jurors choosing between a death sentence and a life term in prison should be told if the convicted killer has no chance of parole. The court ruled 5-4 that jurors at the 1996 trial of William Kelly, a convicted South Carolina killer, should have known that he could never be released if he was sentenced to life in prison. Justice David Souter wrote for a majority that included Justices John Paul Stevens, Sandra Day O'Connor, Ruth Bader Ginsburg and Stephen Breyer. Chief Justice William H. Rehnquist and Justices Anthony M. Kennedy, Antonin Scalia and Clarence Thomas dissented. The case is Kelly v. South Carolina, 00-9280. The decision can be found at: http://www.supremecourtus.gov/opinions/01slipopinion.html
— SOURCES
- (Sources: Associated Press, 09/01/2002)
KEEP READING
ALL THE NEWS · DEATH PENALTY On the same front

DEATH PENALTYAUGUST 31, 2026
Pakistan: ASI sentenced to death for killing two brothers in Swabi

DEATH PENALTYAUGUST 31, 2026
Bangladesh: HC confirms death sentence of lone accused for rape, murder of 8-year-old Asiya

DEATH PENALTYAUGUST 30, 2026
Pakistan: Man sentenced to death, brother gets life term for double murder in 2021

DEATH PENALTYAUGUST 23, 2026
Eastern Libya executes 10 convicted on terrorism charges

DEATH PENALTYAUGUST 21, 2026
Japan: man executed over killing 5 people

DEATH PENALTYAUGUST 15, 2026
