The death penalty is provided for by the Penal Code...
The death penalty is provided for by the Penal Code and by Art
3 MIN READ
The death penalty is provided for by the Penal Code and by Art. 21 of the Constitution which states: "No person may be deprived of their life or personal freedom except in cases established by law."
Death-qualifiable offenses are conspiracy against the Indian Government; desertion or attempted desertion; murder or attempted murder; inducement to suicide of a minor or a mentally-retarded person.
The death penalty is not mandatory for these crimes. Section 303 of the Indian Penal Code (IPC) prescribes the death penalty alone with no alternative in cases where a convict, serving a life sentence commits murder. The court under this section cannot exercise its discretion and award a lesser sentence. In an attempt to limit the use of the death penalty, Art. 354 of the criminal procedure law establishes that: "The sentences must be motivated and the death sentences must illustrate the particular reasons that led to the decision."
The Constitution Bench of the Supreme Court, in Bachan Singh v State of Punjab, held that the death sentence as a punishment should be awarded only in the "rarest of rare" cases. The arguments of Justice Chandrachud in Mithu v State of Punjab (1983 SCC (Cr) 404) on the constitutional validity of Section 303 are extremely relevant. Citing several decisions by the Supreme Court which expanded the meaning and scope of Arts. 14 (Right to Equality) and 21 (Right to Life and Personal Liberty), he argued that Art. 21 could now be read as "No person shall be deprived of his right to life or personal liberty except according to fair, just and reasonable procedure established by valid law."
He further said: "The last word on the question of justness or fairness does not rest with the legislature... It is for the courts to decide whether the procedure prescribed by a law for depriving a person of his life or liberty is fair, just and reasonable." This decision unequivocally advocates the striking down of Section 303 as unconstitutional.
On February 12, 1999, the Maharashtra Control of Organized Crime Ordinance, 1999, was signed by President K.R. Narayanan, and came into immediate effect throughout the state. For the first time the concept of organized crime has been made an offense and any person guilty of such an offense that results in death shall be punishable with death or imprisonment for life and shall also be liable to a fine of a minimum of Rs one lakh ($2,353).
The Indian legislative system also provides for different levels of appeal, and death sentences are frequently commuted to life imprisonment upon appeal. The President also has the power to issue pardons. The last executions were held in 1995 when 5 people were hanged.
While Indian law allows death penalty for males above 16, Article 6 (5) of the International Covenant on Civil and Political Rights, which India ratified in 1979, and Article 37 of the Convention on the Rights of the Child, ratified by India in 1992, make the minimum age 18 years.
Section 3(2a) of the Prevention Of Terrorist Activities Act (Pota) says "whoever commits a terrorist act, shall be punishable with death or imprisonment for life and also shall be liable to a fine."
The following sections of the Indian Penal Code (IPC) are punishable with the death penalty: Section 121, on waging or attempting to wage a war against the government of India, which attracts death or imprisonment for life and a fine.
Section 302, on murder, punishment for which is death or life imprisonment with a fine.
Death-qualifiable offenses are conspiracy against the Indian Government; desertion or attempted desertion; murder or attempted murder; inducement to suicide of a minor or a mentally-retarded person.
The death penalty is not mandatory for these crimes. Section 303 of the Indian Penal Code (IPC) prescribes the death penalty alone with no alternative in cases where a convict, serving a life sentence commits murder. The court under this section cannot exercise its discretion and award a lesser sentence. In an attempt to limit the use of the death penalty, Art. 354 of the criminal procedure law establishes that: "The sentences must be motivated and the death sentences must illustrate the particular reasons that led to the decision."
The Constitution Bench of the Supreme Court, in Bachan Singh v State of Punjab, held that the death sentence as a punishment should be awarded only in the "rarest of rare" cases. The arguments of Justice Chandrachud in Mithu v State of Punjab (1983 SCC (Cr) 404) on the constitutional validity of Section 303 are extremely relevant. Citing several decisions by the Supreme Court which expanded the meaning and scope of Arts. 14 (Right to Equality) and 21 (Right to Life and Personal Liberty), he argued that Art. 21 could now be read as "No person shall be deprived of his right to life or personal liberty except according to fair, just and reasonable procedure established by valid law."
He further said: "The last word on the question of justness or fairness does not rest with the legislature... It is for the courts to decide whether the procedure prescribed by a law for depriving a person of his life or liberty is fair, just and reasonable." This decision unequivocally advocates the striking down of Section 303 as unconstitutional.
On February 12, 1999, the Maharashtra Control of Organized Crime Ordinance, 1999, was signed by President K.R. Narayanan, and came into immediate effect throughout the state. For the first time the concept of organized crime has been made an offense and any person guilty of such an offense that results in death shall be punishable with death or imprisonment for life and shall also be liable to a fine of a minimum of Rs one lakh ($2,353).
The Indian legislative system also provides for different levels of appeal, and death sentences are frequently commuted to life imprisonment upon appeal. The President also has the power to issue pardons. The last executions were held in 1995 when 5 people were hanged.
While Indian law allows death penalty for males above 16, Article 6 (5) of the International Covenant on Civil and Political Rights, which India ratified in 1979, and Article 37 of the Convention on the Rights of the Child, ratified by India in 1992, make the minimum age 18 years.
Section 3(2a) of the Prevention Of Terrorist Activities Act (Pota) says "whoever commits a terrorist act, shall be punishable with death or imprisonment for life and also shall be liable to a fine."
The following sections of the Indian Penal Code (IPC) are punishable with the death penalty: Section 121, on waging or attempting to wage a war against the government of India, which attracts death or imprisonment for life and a fine.
Section 302, on murder, punishment for which is death or life imprisonment with a fine.
KEEP READING
ALL THE NEWS · DEATH PENALTY On the same front

DEATH PENALTYSEPTEMBER 10, 2026
Oman: new law introduces death penalty in drug crimes

DEATH PENALTYSEPTEMBER 10, 2026
USA - Florida. Daniel Conahan, 72, White, was executed on September 10

DEATH PENALTYSEPTEMBER 9, 2026
Pakistan: LHC acquits death-row prisoner after nearly seven years

DEATH PENALTYSEPTEMBER 9, 2026
IRAN - 3 men executed in Isfahan on September 9

DEATH PENALTYSEPTEMBER 8, 2026
Thailand: killer of Hua Hin hotel receptionist sentenced to death

DEATH PENALTYSEPTEMBER 8, 2026
