David Blunkett, the UK home secretary, came under fire...
David Blunkett, the UK home secretary, came under fire from backbench MPs who voiced opposition to his controversial anti-terrorist legislation, which proposes to detain terrorist suspects without trial
1 MIN READ
David Blunkett, the UK home secretary, came under fire from backbench MPs who voiced opposition to his controversial anti-terrorist legislation, which proposes to detain terrorist suspects without trial.
At the second reading of the Anti-Terrorism, Security and Crime Bill, MPs criticised the home secretary for rushing through legislation: "When this house acts quickly it seldom acts wisely," warned one Labour backbencher.
Mr Blunkett defended the government's position and said that the events of September 11 "warranted immediate action".
He maintained that detaining terrorist suspects without trial was not an abuse of human rights even though the UK is the only European country planning to suspend part of the human rights conventions in order to introduce the legislation.
Under current plans, a suspect could be held for up to six months where deportation is impossible because they would face the death penalty if sent home.
The Anti-Terrorism, Security and Crime Bill could become law by Christmas.
Civil rights groups have reacted angrily to the proposals. John Wadham, director of Liberty, said it was a "fundamental violation of the rule of law, our rights and traditional British values".
At the second reading of the Anti-Terrorism, Security and Crime Bill, MPs criticised the home secretary for rushing through legislation: "When this house acts quickly it seldom acts wisely," warned one Labour backbencher.
Mr Blunkett defended the government's position and said that the events of September 11 "warranted immediate action".
He maintained that detaining terrorist suspects without trial was not an abuse of human rights even though the UK is the only European country planning to suspend part of the human rights conventions in order to introduce the legislation.
Under current plans, a suspect could be held for up to six months where deportation is impossible because they would face the death penalty if sent home.
The Anti-Terrorism, Security and Crime Bill could become law by Christmas.
Civil rights groups have reacted angrily to the proposals. John Wadham, director of Liberty, said it was a "fundamental violation of the rule of law, our rights and traditional British values".
— SOURCES
- (Sources: FT.COM, 19/11/2001)
KEEP READING
ALL THE NEWS · DEATH PENALTY On the same front

DEATH PENALTYSEPTEMBER 2, 2026
IRAN - Aziz Roshanayi executed in Shiraz on September 2

DEATH PENALTYAUGUST 31, 2026
Pakistan: ASI sentenced to death for killing two brothers in Swabi

DEATH PENALTYAUGUST 31, 2026
Bangladesh: HC confirms death sentence of lone accused for rape, murder of 8-year-old Asiya

DEATH PENALTYAUGUST 31, 2026
IRAN - Mojtaba Salahi Laghani executed in Rasht on September 2

DEATH PENALTYAUGUST 30, 2026
Pakistan: Man sentenced to death, brother gets life term for double murder in 2021

DEATH PENALTYAUGUST 23, 2026
