USA - Florida. Supreme Court Strikes Down Florida's Strict IQ Cutoff for Death Penalty.

Supreme Court Strikes Down Florida's Strict IQ Cutoff for Death Penalty. The U.S. Supreme Court held in Hall v. Florida that Florida's strict IQ cutoff for determining intellectual disability in capital cases is unconstitutional. The Court concluded, "Florida’s law contravenes our Nation’s commitment to dignity and its duty to teach human decency as the mark of a civilized world." In 2002, the Court banned the execution of people with "mental retardation," but allowed states leeway in selecting a process for determining who would qualify for that exemption. According to Florida's Supreme Court, defendants with an IQ even one point above 70 cannot be considered intellectually disabled, even though most states allow for a margin of error in such tests. The Supreme Court's 5-4 ruling today stated that Florida's strict rule "disregards established medical practice" and noted that the "vast majority of states" rejected such a narrow interpretation of IQ scores. The Court held that, "When a defendant's IQ test score falls within the test's acknowledged and inherent margin of error, the defendant must be able to present additional evidence of intellectual disability, including testimony regarding adaptive deficits." Hall will receive a new hearing on his intellectual disability claim. The case involved Freddie Lee Hall, 68, Black, who has lived more than half his life on Florida's death row. He was sentenced to death for raping and killing Karol Hurst, 21 years old and pregnant, after he and a co-defendant kidnapped her on February 21, 1978. The men killed a police officer, Lonnie Coburn, who interrupted their plans to rob a convenience store later that day. Lawyers for Hall have argued in decades of court procedures that he should be spared because of a brutal childhood and because he has been identified since he was a boy, and later by some judges, as mentally retarded. The case is Hall v. Florida.